DNApes (Culture & Alcohol, Female Orgasms), TTruthseeker (Newsletter & GOP Agents), GB Jesuits (OWS), MSPC ( Liberals)

DNApes: culture more then consumption determines reaction to alcohol

Andrea Muhrrteyn said...
Interesting Post Mimi,

I would agree with the lady. I used to belong to a culture known as 'western civilisation' although I must admit, what I now know about culture, I would not classify that as having been a culture at all. It has no clear simply articulated codes of conduct, that the entire 'culture' adhere to. Anyway while I was a member of that alleged 'culture' I behaved very similar to your British friends.

I gave up that culture and found myself a new culture; a small cult, as it is (small culture, being a cult), a tribe that does have clear articulated values, codoes of conduct, simply articulated, etc. My views towards alcohol totally changed; as has my behaviour when I do have a drink, which is infrequent; and very very seldom in great quantities.

Your Bavarian Beerlady reminds me of good German friend with whom I sailed with on SY Aiglon through the Greek Islands, and went to the Munich Beerfest with.

12 October, 2011 4:07 AM


____________________

TTruthseeker: Newsletter

At 06:55 , Andrea Muhrrteyn said...

Tim:

What is your interpretation of what "Ecumenical Movement and Dominionism" means?



_______________________

TTruthseeker: Prophecy Information

At 10:52 , Andrea Muhrrteyn said...

Well; I don't know about any of that. Sounds like gibberish to me. Too much abstract intellectualism, not defined. Doubt if they even know that one persons use of all those abstract terms probably means something totally different than anothers, cause they lack the critical thinking enquiry to confront each other and ask. But I am not informed on that stuff.

If your question is: Part 8: Is The Pretribber In Danger Of Accepting A New Age Christ?

I don't know what a pretribber is; but if you think I am, thats okay; you are welcome to your interpretation. But I don't consider myself a pretribber whatever that is.

I ain't interested in joining any religion where its pastors or priest is not willing to explain any issue as honestly and simply as possible.

Any religion interested in fake conversions, in converting people to their church, whether it is new age, christian, catholic, atheist, whatever; by bullshit and propaganda, because they are only interested in the number of the sheep, not the quality of the content of their message ain't worth serious consideration as a church.

I don't know if there is any organized religion where such religion is interested in 100% sincere conversions, founded on reason, logic and an honourable refusal to lie to any individual in order to get them to join their church.

So, I view all organized religions as simply different versions of fantasy stories for adults, in the same way as Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs and Humpty Dumpty are fantasy stories for children.

You can provide a child with a fantasy story that helps them to learn something, to find new values worth living up to; to explain ideas; to teach them critical thinking, to create a world of sovereign republic citizens. Or you can fill their little minds with brainwashing propaganda crap, so that you can benefit from using them as human fodder for your human cattle fodder kaffir farm.

I think perhaps if I ever thought of starting a religion, maybe to make sure that you don't get fake converts; you can ask them to answer a bunch of questions, and after each question they should play some russian roulette. If they live after all the questions, and russian roulette tests. I guess you can consider them a sincere convert. Thats one idea to make sure you don't get a bunch of fake converts to your church. I am sure you could think of quite a few. But then how many churches are serious about making sure they don't get fake converts? Perhaps, cause all they are really interested in is: human cattle fodder kaffirs?


At 11:16 , Andrea Muhrrteyn said...

Only type of prophecy I consider worthy of serious attention to is that which can be verified by scientific common sense laws.

For example: If you have a piece of land that can sustain 5 healthy cows; and you get greedy and think you can flood the land with 10 cows; then you are going to transgress its 5 cow carrying capacity. You are going to breach its ecological carrying capacity tipping point. Your cows are going to get a natural scientific prophecy trip to starvation.

If you consider any issue to be a problem, then to solve such problem you need to find the root causes of the problem. If the bath is overflowing, close the tap, or pull the plug. If you live in a mental politically correct universe that demands you pretend the bath doesn't have a plug, and the tap is not flowing with water, cause you lack the intellectual capacity to hear the information that tap is providing to you - flowing water - and instead want to shut it up, as 'tap hate speech' or 'tap racism' or 'tap anti-semitism' or some such bullshit. PROPHECY: YOUR PROBLEM IS NEVER GOING TO BE SOLVED OR GO AWAY.

____________________

DNApes: Genetic analysis of orgasmic function in twins and siblings does not support the by-product theory of female orgasm


Andrea Muhrrteyn said...

Mimi,

Using questionnaire data from over 10 000 Finnish twins and siblings, we found significant genetic variation in both male and female orgasmic function, but no significant correlation between opposite-sex twins and siblings.

I am sorry, but when an alleged 'scientific study' talks about questionnaires, rather than actual scientific tests; I consider it a Fairy Tail study.

I once went enrolled as a study subject for a pharmacology test of soemthing or other. They asked me a bunch of questions to determine whether I had the right medical background. What illnesses I had, drugs I had taken, etc. I was honest, mentioned I had smoked marijuana. They then said I could not be considered, cause that was a requirement; but they would just ignore my answer and say I had never used marijuana. I refused. I said You aren't going to lie on my application. How many others are you lying for? Put differently, I have no doubt they accept people who lie through their teeth, about having the required so called 'required medical history' the test requires, when they have anything but.

What does that say for such an alleged scientific studies final results?

FUCK ALL?

Surely if you are going to test the orgasmic function of a woman's orgasm, you need to do it, while she is actually experiencing the orgasm; like the Pentagon does?

19 October, 2011 9:51 AM


_____________________

Good Jesuit, Bad Jesuit: Monumentally Stupid

Andrea Muhrrteyn said...
I am not sure exactly how you define 'monumentally stupid'; and can consider a few different interpretations; and none of them may be what you actually mean. So I am not able to say whether I agree with your interpretation.

Frankly, I consider the Occupy Wall Street protestors incredibly naive. I would not want them in my church. They sound like people who want to go to an Alcoholics Anonymous meeting and get free beer and wine, in order to participate. Absolutley stunningly bereft of any critical thinking skills, is my view.

October 19, 2011 1:24 PM

__________________

MSPolCommentary: A lesson to liberals: “We only saw her skin colour” says killer of Amy Biehl


Liberals suffer from excessive fragile ego's; and massive guilt complexes about their white supremacy feeligns towards blacks, which they don't have hte courage to state frankly.

So instead of being honest with blacks about their secret opinions about blacks, their guilt drives them to pretend they believe all are equal and in order to feel better about themselves (knowing what scum they really are, their liberalism is like crack cocaine to a ghetto addict) they choose to 'defend blacks against those evil racists'.

The same 'evil racists' who care more about blacks than thousands of liberals combined could; becuase any alleged 'evil racists' cares enough about a black man, to believe the black man has the capability of hearing honest criticism. That is the essence of equality: to believe that someone who is not equal, has the capability of becoming equal, if they are only provied with honest feedback, about how they are currently unequal.

Blacks who are or want to be really equal, appreciate honest criticism from anyone, and don't choose to interpret it as 'racism', but as valid or invalid criticism. If the criticism is valid, they fix their behaviour, in their path towards equality; and the more they do so, the more they are able to go beyond many white people (such as liberals) who are totally incapable of hearing constructive criticism.

Consider Walter Williams, Pastor James Manning, etc.


_________________

TTruthseeker: Agents of GOP


At 12:45 , Andrea Muhrrteyn said...

Okay. I agree.

I shall finalize the draft, etc; so that submissions can begin.

Time to determine how many, willing to leave Plausible Deniability behind.