7Francis Marion Braidfute
Interesting observations Mr. Wallace,
Wow, so much you could say. I'll just say this. I once met a man, who changed my world, because he proved to me, that there are men of honour. To me honour, is the most attrractive aspect of man. Without honour, the rest is totally meaningless and plastic. With honour, he can be poor and ugly; I don't care, he is worth every minute of time, I spend in his company.
I had given up hope, that honour existed. For me, honour is simple honesty. If he is grumpy, or irritated, or needs space, or whatever, say so. As do I. No mind games, straight talk. No fake promises, no BS stories. He was a former Marine; and he gave me hope, not cause he told me what i wanted to hear, but because he refused to lie to me. But I also know that very, very few women consider 'honour' their top priority.
Even women I consider my friends, have other priorities in their choices for what they find attractive in a man.
Very, very few are remotely aware of the conscious gender roles shaping that has occurred, to weaken families; cause weaker families, make for weaker goverments. Of those very few they may know about Bernays, and Tavistock and Changing Images of Mankind, etc. etc.; but when it comes to applying how such social science engineering has affected their own decsiion making in whom they choose to consider quality male companionship, their 2 + 2 almost never equals 4.
So, I appreciate you for speaking your mind. I hope you don't give up hope that all women, are as you describe above.
Look forward to hearing more of your thoughts though. Its an important and interesting conversation, I think.
______________________
69Francis Marion Braidfute
Is it possible, you guys are digging your own holes?. Why is your priority 'attractiveness'? instead of character or loyalty, or honour, or faitfullness, or sincerity???
Why do you follow the brainwashing dictum, for whom you should find attractive? If you know they are brainwashing you with concepts of 'whiteness'; how come you don't know that they are brainwashing you with concepts of 'beauty'?
If you look for attractiveness. Then you must not be surprised that when you find it, that woman, spends all the time, working on cultivating her attractiveness. If you spent your time looking for honour or character; you would find someone who spends htier time and focus on cultivating htier character, or becoming a better, person; then you could partner with someone who shares those qualities with you, and your relationship just grows stronger.
Until you change your values, and priorities, you should not be surprised when you actually find what you are looking for.
I gave up on zirchonia's a long long time ago. And I found myself my rough cut blue diamond, whom to me is the most beautiful, gorgeous man alive. Because of his character, and his values. He is truly a blue diamond thoroughbred. A treasure.
You too can find yourselves a rough cut diamond, but not while you are being brainwashed with zirconia dogma's about beauty.
Think about it.
=====================================
Rooshv: The Boner Test
I once gave a guy a full orgasm: young good looking stockbroker from San Francisco. He had got himself a rock hard cock, and great orgasm, without him even undoing his zip. He littlerally orgasmed in his pants, upon the voice and touch stimulation only of a woman he honestly did not find attractive.
We met on craigslist. He told me had this problem that he could not get a boner for girls he did not find attractive. I told him I doubted he'd find me attractive, but was he interested in a sexual experiment. Test his mind and boner belief theory. No strings.
We did the 'Is my boner belief a mindfuck prison' experiment, and proved his minds boner theory totally incorrect. He is no longer in his boner belief prison.
===============================
Lara Zhivago
December 11, 2011 at 12:53
Interesting. I am a feminist; whose definition of feminism, and actions in according to her definition of feminism do not fit any of the descriptions of behaviour of Mr. Donovan’s feminists; to the contrary.
Unfortunately — unlike anti-feminist Mr. Eivind Berge — Mr. Jack Donovan is too petrified to hold an honest conversation with a feminist whom does not fit his definition of feminism, nor does he wish to admit that not all feminists share the same goals; and that there are feminists who are critical of other feminists.
So, until he acts with more honour and integrity, would it be fair for me to read what he writes to be nothing but vitriolic drivel?
The brief conversation I had with Mr. Donovan (which he then deleted, goodness knows why: protecting his PR image? Unable to be real and be himself?) is available in the comment section at: Violence is Golden in King Arthus Hall of Viking Manliness; on Norway v. Breivik :: Uncensored.
_________________
RMM
December 11, 2011 at 13:40
@Lara
“So, until he acts with more honour and integrity, would it be fair for me to read what he writes to be nothing but vitriolic drivel?”
You can do whatever the hell you want, really. Why should we care?
___________________
Lara Zhivago
December 11, 2011 at 13:46
@JohnX
I know a brutally honest nice guy – with a beer belly – who happens to attract women to him due to his simple brutal honesty. He doesn’t play bullshit manipulative games, doesn’t lie about wanting to spend forever with them; just is brutally honest: he is attracted to them, and would like to know if they are interested in sex. If not initially, he is not offended, he says: let me know if you change your mind. He’s slept with over 500 women, many of them considered by other men to be ‘status fucks’.
Do you think his brutal honesty and avoidance of mindfuck passive aggressive manipulative bullshit works; cause women know where they stand, and can make a fully informed decision; and subsequently enjoy the sex, without strings, and being totally spontaneous?
Why are you all on such a pity party, when you could simply choose to be more honest, more forthright and get more sex, based on fully informed consensual agreements, that benefits you and the woman?
_________________
Lara Zhivago
December 11, 2011 at 13:59
@RMM
“So, until he acts with more honour and integrity, would it be fair for me to read what he writes to be nothing but vitriolic drivel?”
>>You can do whatever the hell you want, really. Why should we care?<<
Who is 'we'?
I am not in the habit of telling anyone that they 'should' do anything. I support people to do whatever they want, to live in accordance to the values they preach; whatever their values are.
I was under the impression that Mr. Donovan's values and principles on the matter was that he is sincerely and seriously (honourably) concerned about the feminist – anti-feminist problem; that he would like to resolve it. Perhaps find new perspective to it; he has an open mind, and is looking for new information.
It appears I may have been in error. If so my apologies. I shall not bother Mr. Donovan with my beliefs that he was honourably and sincerely concerned about the 'feminist' problem he feels a victim of. Having worked with people addicted to being victims; I am aware that many enjoy victimhood, enjoy feeling sorry for themselves, enjoy whining about how sorry and pitiful their lives are because of some alleged victimizers. I thought he was different; but I must have made a mistake!
Anyway, no worries, my apologies. If he enjoys his victimhood, thats fine!
____________________
Aharon
December 11, 2011 at 14:04
“… is too petrified to hold an honest conversation with a feminist whom does not fit his definition of feminism…”
There goes another boring feminist using the old shamming tactic attempt to control a man. We’ve heard it many times before that so and so named man is scared of this, petrified of that, terrified of blah blah blah. Boring. While it is true that there are more type, school of thought err emotional behavior, or definition of feminism it is also true that feminists are generally incapable of having an honest conversation on most issues. The reason is that their religious ideologies are based on a distortion of the facts, hysteria, an attitude that any ends justify the means to achieving their feminist supremacist utopia, an ignorance of men/women/human nature, irrational reasoning, and well you get the idea.
Lara, please use a napkin to wipe up your drivel. It’s gross.
____________________
poester99
December 11, 2011 at 14:10
Why are you all on such a pity party,
hmm… relationship advice from a feminist…
Yep.. Sounds legit..
_____________________
Aharon
December 11, 2011 at 14:16
“Who is ‘we’?”
— We Lara are the men of the Men’s Movement and more specifically the MRA at this site. Obviously, as a feminazi, you are not used to men sticking up for another man especially when another crazy female is barking away.
“Anyway, no worries, my apologies. If he enjoys his victimhood, thats fine!”
— There you go again with your attempts to shame, humiliate, and manipulate a man to doing what you want. Your public posting here fools no one. It is obvious you are trying to play the victim here so you can now stop trying to top from the bottom.
Wipe up your drivel and run along.
___________________
Aharon
December 11, 2011 at 14:25
“Why are you all on such a pity party, when you could simply choose to be more honest, more forthright and get more sex, based on fully informed consensual agreements, that benefits you and the woman?”
OMG, another crackpot feminist. That post was hysterical. These feminists and their stories. You guys notice how Lara keeps mentioning others needing to be honest and have an honest conversation? I can smell the feminist bs coming from my computer screen when I read her posts.
Hey men, I’m outa here to go for a long walk. Later.
_____________________
Mr. Freeze
December 11, 2011 at 14:28
Lara said:
“Interesting. I am a feminist; whose definition of feminism, and actions in according to her definition of feminism do not fit any of the descriptions of behaviour of Mr. Donovan’s feminists; to the contrary.”
Maybe that’s because Feminists seem to be unwilling or unable to honestly examine their motives and methods in a way which might question the logic that All Women Are Innocent.
Their self-absorbed, image-obssessed double-standards and blatantly opportunistic hypocrisies, coupled with their willful cognitive dissonance and over-inflated self-esteem, have rendered them incapable of any sort of honest introspection.
Though granted, Feminists don’t hold a monopoly on such assholism …
But they sure as hell have perfected it.
_______________
JFP
December 11, 2011 at 14:41
“Why are you all on such a pity party, when you could simply choose to be more honest, more forthright and get more sex, based on fully informed consensual agreements, that benefits you and the woman?”
Until such time as it benefits the woman to lie about making a fully informed consensual agreement with said beer belly bro. Coyote ugly for women is not scrambling home and during the walk of shame swear to never drink again. Its a walk of shame that days/weeks later ends up at the police station claiming “rape” to avoid the fact that they just might be a slut who slept with a ugly/low status guy.
___________________
Lara Zhivago
December 11, 2011 at 14:52
Hmmmm…..
So:
Dunning and Kruger is alive and well in the Men’s Movement, on Spearhead
Jack Donovan only pretends he is interested in sincere conversations, but its just a bunch of bullshit.
You are not allowed to expose the reality that a man says one thing and does the opposite, and when he sticks his tail between his legs and runs away from an honest conversation.
Exposing a white man behaving like a gutless coward; is to be a ‘feminazi’; but no white man will be upset if you expose a white woman, black man or woman, or any other ethnic man or woman from being a gutless coward!
Just white men from the ‘mens movement’!
NEVER EVER EXPOSE A MAN FROM THE MENS MOVEMENT, TALKING BULLSHIT CRAP ABOUT ‘MANLINESS’ AND COURAGE AND HONOUR, AS BEING A GUTLESS COWARD!!
Hmm, interesting little rule you got there!
______________________
Jack Donovan
December 11, 2011 at 15:05
Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned.
______________________
Highwasp
December 11, 2011 at 15:08
Lara
“Why are you all on such a pity party, when you could simply choose to be more honest, more forthright and get more sex, based on fully informed consensual agreements, that benefits you and the woman?”
Uh let me think on this for a second – oh yeah how about said beer belly having no procreative rights if she gets pregnant? consider 18 years living with the option of funding her decision or living in a cage… yeah that makes me want to propose sex up front – oh wait then there’s the risk for accusations of sexual harassment, back to the cage – not to mention rape or false rape charges if she decides he didn’t meet her requirements…
____________________
Lara Zhivago
December 11, 2011 at 15:22
@Jack
Nice cliche Jack!
When my assassin buddy stuck his fist two inches from my face, and said: ‘I will fucking kill you if you tell anyone the shit I just told you.’ I said: ‘Go ahead motherfucker!’
So: all that ‘honour’ and ”manliness’ and ‘conducting myself as a man in the world’ and all this on and on and on… and you cannot pull your tail from between your legs to say:
‘Thanks, but no thanks; I am not interested in a conversation; I just pretend to be all that honour and manliness shit; but its all a fucking charade! Gets me a big following though of pity party white victim males; which is a massive boost for my ego.’
Not even: FUCK OFF BITCH, I DON’T SPEAK TO ANY WOMEN, CAUSE I HATE ALL WOMEN?
Ever heard of Information Operations 101 Jack. Its the military equivalent of HONOURABLE COMMUNICATIONS?
When you engage someone openly with “white” information operations, i.e. IO where your identity is clear and explicit, you imply that they are roughly your equal. By speaking to or of them directly, you point up that they are important enough to demand your attention and your reply.
– Field Manual No. FM 3-0, Headquarters Department of the Army, June 2001: Chapter 11: Information Superiority
I have no problem if you are not interested in a conversation. None at all. SAYS SO FOR FUCKS SAKES!
I have a problem with any man or woman (white, black, green or pink) who use the word honour and integrity, and ‘manliness’ and is just a bunch of gutless cowards; who cannot even find the words: THANKS, BUT NO THANKS in their so-called ‘honour’ vocabulary!!
_____________________
RMM
December 11, 2011 at 15:26
@Lara
We were having a conversation. And by “we”, since apparently you need clarification, I mean everyone who was posting before you arrived.
We’re interested in honest conversation. We just not interested in talking with you, as it’d be a waste of time.
Got it yet?
________________
Lara Zhivago
December 11, 2011 at 15:28
@ Highwasp
Ask the man yourself if you don’t believe me. His name is Brad Blanton, and he is fucking awesome! Serious! He changed my life, and he will change yours! Your life will never be the same again! No more pity party, just adventure, new friends, honest women, and much more!
Here he is running for Office:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gx-OVdTkwvA
Here is an article in Esquire that he wrote about honest male and female relationships:
* The Most Honest Conversation in the World
http://www.esquire.com/features/conversation0707
* I Think You’re Fat
http://www.esquire.com/features/honesty0707
___________________
Lara Zhivago
December 11, 2011 at 15:35
@RMM
>> We were having a conversation. And by “we”, since apparently you need clarification, I mean everyone who was posting before you arrived. We’re interested in honest conversation. We just not interested in talking with you, as it’d be a waste of time. Got it yet? <<
Got it. RMM.
I appreciate your honesty.
No worries. Let me know if you change your mind.
Thanks again. Take care.
________________________
Robert Marsh
December 11, 2011 at 15:42
It made me laugh at the irony when I read that one of the females was called Anne Oakley! Annie Oakley was the famous female sharpshooter that toured in the Buffalo Bill Wild West Show in the late 1800′s. The play “Annie Get Your Gun” is loosely based on her life.
______________________
Jack Donovan
December 11, 2011 at 15:47
Lara is hilarious.
_____________________
poester99
December 11, 2011 at 16:09
Jack, that was a wonderful article. I see you’re getting the attention of professional trolls, please keep it up!
_____________________
Muk
December 11, 2011 at 16:16
She sounds like a nutjob to me…
______________________
poester99
December 11, 2011 at 16:25
Lara Zhivago December 11, 2011 at 15:22
@Jack
Nice cliche Jack! ..
Now correct me if I’m wrong, but I think she likes you…
_________________________
Lara Zhivago
December 11, 2011 at 16:40
@Muk
I am way beyond a nutjob!! Been at nutjob101, got the tshirt; spent time in maximum security mental ward; just like my buddy Randle McMurphy; got myself a silent Chief Bromden; except my Chief is a Blue Eyed Cherokee Ranker (aka Terrorist); who got Nurse Ratched to promote me to Nutjob Ph.D! Aiming to become the planets Nutjob Czar!
You? Another goddamn fucker aiming working your butt off in some slave corporations in the name of mass production and mass consumption, who thinks the aim of your life is a good job, nice house, and 2.2 kids; whose passion is to be rewarded with the white man’s legal equivalent of looting: a steady job, secure income, easy credit, free access to all the local emporiums and a home of your own to pile the merchandise in!
And so what if there is no magic in your life, no wonder, no amazement, no playfulness, no peace of mind, no sense of unity with the universe, no giggling joy, no burning passion, no deep understanding, no overwhelming NutJob love?
Heeaaah!
Your Certifiable Semper Fidelis Nutjob Feminazi Ph.D
______________________
Venom Froggy
December 11, 2011 at 17:26
@Lara Zhivago:
QUOTE:
@JohnX
I know a brutally honest nice guy – with a beer belly – who happens to attract women to him due to his simple brutal honesty. He doesn’t play bullshit manipulative games, doesn’t lie about wanting to spend forever with them; just is brutally honest: he is attracted to them, and would like to know if they are interested in sex. If not initially, he is not offended, he says: let me know if you change your mind. He’s slept with over 500 women, many of them considered by other men to be ‘status fucks’.
Do you think his brutal honesty and avoidance of mindfuck passive aggressive manipulative bullshit works; cause women know where they stand, and can make a fully informed decision; and subsequently enjoy the sex, without strings, and being totally spontaneous?
Why are you all on such a pity party, when you could simply choose to be more honest, more forthright and get more sex, based on fully informed consensual agreements, that benefits you and the woman?
UNQUOTE
Well, Lara, the reason why most of us don’t engage in the brutal honesty you women claim to desire is because you ladies are full of shit.
Most of you claim to want us men to be honest with you, but when we are, you want GAME. Only a small minority of men are able to get away with the audacity this fat fellow was able to display.
Also, there’s the little fact that women absolutely hate male virgins and/or any male who doesn’t deliver in the sack.
If he fails or if he turns out to be a fake bad boy, that woman will have NO REMORSE turning him over to the cops for “raping” her.
But do you ladies care? No.
So what good are you and what good is your touching little story about this fat fuck at the bar who happens to be the EXCEPTION instead of the RULE? None.
__________________
Pops
December 11, 2011 at 17:42
“I know a brutally honest nice guy – with a beer belly – who happens to attract women to him due to his simple brutal honesty.”
You allegedly know such a guy. Of course, if such brutal honesty actually worked, men would utilize it widespread. But it is common for femists to argue points by citing alleged personal experiences and treat such alleged experiences as proof even if actual professional research says otherwise.
They then label references to professional research to counter their alleged personal experiences as “gaslighting”. But I seriously doubt that you know such a guy and you yourself, in an attempt to prove a point, are not being honest.
_____________________
Muk
December 11, 2011 at 17:45
@lara:
Lmao! I love it!!
You get a great green thumb up from me with that response
_____________________
Rmaxd
December 11, 2011 at 18:19
@ Lara Another feminist tests the waters on a mra site, before sending her hordes of eunuch’d single moms …
Oh yea, Lara your gender studies were wrong … theres no such a thing as lesbianism, its just mutual masturbation, just like marxism & feminism …
women cant even get masturbation right, they need cancer causing bpa filled plastic toys & braindamaged women posing as homosexuals …
Lesbianism = entitled chick too brainwashed by feminism to satisfy a real penis …
Feminism = Retarded lesbian worshipper, the gender politic version of creationism … gets owned by every known field of science daily … & then some
Radfem = White women who hate white nationalists & mangina’s equally … we thank radfems for being too retarded to co-opt white nationalists & other pussy worshipping cops & judges … actually we thank them for being too stupid to co-opt any allies …
4th wave feminism = Women stupidly Enabled social engineers to screw over our education system, & usher in strip searching TSA agents & a brutal police state filled with pussy worshipping cops & judges
Thanks for outdoing Orwell’s brave new world, hordes of muslims & spear throwing africans will eventually wipe single moms as they destroy our communities
Fortunately for us the vast majority of whites are still farmers, & retain the agarian cultures of our ancestors
It is they along with men everywhere who will stand against the hordes of social engineers & their manginas
& rebuild our societies
Ok so the french revolution was an artificially engineered event, but the conditions behinds its success are the same today, the sheer brutality of the unjust
Lara hope you enjoyed your gender realist lesson … now go beg for some seed … ask your brain damaged homosexuals for directions
__________________________
buggeroff11
December 11, 2011 at 19:23
Lara Zzzzzzz ……omg you lost us at ‘I am a feminist’ If you were anything like you say you are, the LAST thing you would be is a feminist! you would be ‘a woman’ with zero need to be propped up with falsehoods & nowhere near that male hate and hypocrisy that IS feminism.
____________________________
andybob
December 11, 2011 at 19:41
I know a brutally honest nice guy…just is brutally honest…his brutal honesty… – Lara Zhivago
If only Ms Zhivago were aware how easily feminists like her condemn themselves. I have no doubt that the thug-hungry females of her aquaintance have lined up to spread for this brutally brutal brute
Of course, no-one at The Spearhead would ever doubt that it is because he is a really nice guy.
______________________
Lara Zhivago
December 11, 2011 at 23:19
@Andybob
The comment I posted with the links where you could meet the really nice guy, to determine for yourself if he is a really nice guy (posted: Dec 11, 2011 at 15:28); is being censored from readers like you, by The Spearhead Comment Moderator.
__________________
Lara Zhivago
December 11, 2011 at 23:46
@Venom Froggy
I don’t speak for ‘most of women’ only myself. I can tell you I have met many men who are arseholes. Just cause most of them are arseholes does not mean I judge every new man I meet, based upon the other arseholes. Every man I meet is given the opportunity to prove that he is an individual. Many have done so. I know some absolutely amazing men; men I would take a bullet for, and men that I have placed myself in a position to take a bullet for them. They are exceptions. They are big blue carat diamonds of honesty and honour, amongst a sea of zirchonia bullshit gutless coward liars and pretenders.
If you want to judge every single woman you meet, cause most women are moron imbeciles. That is your choice.
I don’t know what you mean when you use the word ‘GAME’. The quality that I value most in a man is honour. If it wasn’t I would not have bothered to enter into a conversation with Jack Donovan, nor bothered to find out whether his herdlike mob of savages are capable of being knights of honour and holding him accountable to practice what he preaches, or to simply be another warlord of lies and two faced gutless hypocrisy.
I spent a year in a prison cell, cause I tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth 24/7, including to magistrates who are corrupt. I tell them to their face, in court on the record: You are a corrupt motherfucker and here is my evidence. So, I am willing to be held responsible for my actions, and I live standing on my feet like an honourable human who practices what I preach, not crawling around on my like a gutless coward slave to mobocary.
I once dated a man who was a virgin when I met him. Didn’t bother me in the least, to the contrary; I considered it an honour, to teach him what I knew, and to appreciate the values that led him to be a virgin when we met.
Sounds like you are making some seriously awful choices in women.
>>If he fails or if he turns out to be a fake bad boy, that woman will have NO REMORSE turning him over to the cops for “raping” her.<<
I don't disagree there are women such as that; I have spoken up against them and told them what I think of them: lying two faced scumbag sluts and whores pieces of filth. But you would know that, if you did not suffer from Dunning and Kruger.
Its easy to spot them though; if you know what to look for; but it looks like you are addicted to being abused by them, cause you are not remotely interested in ending your pity party poor me victimhood addiction to bitches with no honour!
Clearly you suffer from Dunning and Kruger, and never read the dialogue I had with Jack Donovan that he deleted!
I know a woman who was making love to a Marine. He asked her if he could kill her. She said sure. He brought out his hunting knife and proceeded to make love to her with his hunting knife! She would give her life for him tomorrow, and the next day, and the next day.
How many women you met, you can pull out your hunting knife, during sex, draw their blood, and inform them you are going to kill them with it….. and they will happily take a bullet for you tomorrow?
I ain't got a problem if you addicted to being a poor me victimhood puppy to zirchonia bitches with no honour! If you enjoy your addiction — go right ahead!
I know men of honour, and I ain't come across one on this Spearhead page! I am not surprised — at all — that none of you poor me victimhood pity party addicts intimately know a woman of honour! Not surprised at all!
_________________________
Lara Zhivago
December 12, 2011 at 00:15
@Rmaxd
Not sure what you don’t understand. Appears you think there is only one kind of feminist.
I lived my life, not just preaching by in practice closer to the land and the Amish way of life, than 99% of US and canadian farmers.
Maybe you hear the word feminist, and you are like a bull that has seen a red flag, and you go on automatic zombie mode, because you believe — like your propaganda masters want you to believe — there is only one form of femimism?
So tell me, why are you so ignorant of – shall I call it Amish feminism?
A while back some generals at the Pentagon wanted to know what my thoughts were on, shall I call it Amish feminism. Here were some of my thoughts:
“FATHERHOOD TEST: I AM NOT A GODDAMN FUCKING BROODSOW:
If a man wants me to be the mother of his child, he must be committed to fatherhood for such child FOREVER: TILL DEATH US DO PART. He is welcome to change his mind at any time about it in the future. If so, he is to confront me and the child/ren to our faces, share his reasons (no matter how furious, he can scream insults or obscenities, and if we have such an agreement he can slap me through the face, once if I am being goddamn hard of hearing, and he thinks I need a temporary wake up sensory lobotomy on the issue), listen to mine (same agreement about slapping through the face, if so agreed). If we have vented all our anger, and sincerely cannot resolve the matter; me and the child/ren will forgive him, before he humanely executes us out of his life, in a firing squad. Then he can be free to find himself a new wife, without us being a burden to him.”
Amish Feminism!! ;-)
_____________________
Jack Donovan
December 12, 2011 at 01:07
This is actually getting good.
This is a special kind of crazy.
I guess 5th wave feminism is all about paramilitary Amish sadomasochism.
Feminism 5: A film collaboration by Bruce La Bruce and Takashi Miike
____________________
Migu
December 12, 2011 at 01:47
Lara may be sock puppet for a troll named frieda.
She was at the NiceGuy’s a few weeks ago
Same style and grandiose stories.
_______________________
Lara Zhivago
December 12, 2011 at 02:17
@Migu
Never met frieda, ain’t got a friggin clue who or what ‘NiceGuys’ is. Only nice guys I know are the USMC and Special Forces Nice Guys I know intimately.
Don’t believe me: ask my husband:
His twitter handle: Timothy4316
Hunting Knife Marine Corps Sniper Sgt is: Jon Michael Dye.
Special Forces CIA Assasin: Sgt. Michael Martin
Magistrate whom I called a corrupt white Kaffir in court proceedings who sent me to prison for a year: Magistrate ADS Meyer.
Just cause you guys are a bunch of gutless cowards who tell fancy stories about ‘honour’ and ‘integrity’ and such shit; don’t mean I am one!
Anyone who doesn’t believe any story I told is true; I shall happily provide you names and any contact details I have for you to verify every single story independently.
________________________
Migu
December 12, 2011 at 02:21
Hmmm you’d think I’d know those guys. Then again I was just a Sapper.
________________________
andybob
December 12, 2011 at 02:36
Every now and then, a feminist descends upon us. She often declares that her aim is honest and fair debate – but somewhere along the line, she reveals that her opinion of us was formed long before she arrived. It is usually our ‘failure’ to gasp in awe at the wisdom emanating from her Golden Vagina that ends the charade.
Ms Lara Zhivago has been delivered by an MRA god to remind us never to underestimate the gaping maw of feminist narcissism and depravity. We urge newbies not to step too close. It takes a bit of experience to deal with borderline princesses – especially when they begin ranting about the Pentagon (and its dependence on her expertise in regard to Amish zombies and broodsows).
A few points:
a) The sky is blue, water is wet, and our guest feminist issues foot-stomping demands that she alone sets the parameters of the discussion.
b) The attempts to convince us that eridite, rapier-witted Mr Jack Donovan, published author and long-time Spearhead contributer, would back away from debating a mentally fragile hysteric for any reason other than it’s sheer pointlessness.
c) No woman spends a year in prison for failing to give evidence unless she is refusing to testify against her crack-dealing pimp thug-daddy (and only then if she tried to knife the judge). So, I think we can safely dismiss the ‘testimonial’ about her ‘honour’.
d) It is achingly typical for a feminist to denigrate the concept of men’s rights by making some irrelevant and utterly obtuse reference – such as Prince Charming with the beergut.
e) Note how easily Ms Zhivago makes dark allusions to being poorly used by Mr Donovan in some murky, unspecified way. Beast.
f) The obscure reference to the hunting knife foreplay is where I knew for certain that Ms Zhivago is another sad creature that feminism has undhinged. The Pentagon enquiries clinched it.
If only Ms Zhivago and her ilk knew just how much the good men and women of The Spearhead really do long for an honest and logical debate with a feminist. Sadly, we are subjected to nothing more than the peurile rants from cretins like Ms Zhivago who offer nothing more than illogical feminist hatred, entitlement and lies. That is something we already knew.
As I wrote earlier, feminists comdemn themselves so skilfully that it is sometimes difficult to understand how they manage to maintain so much sway over our world. Another excellent article Mr Donovan. You anger feminists so much that some of them come undone. Now that is genuine talent.
______________________
Geography Bee Finalist himself
December 12, 2011 at 03:09
“Ms Lara Zhivago has been delivered by an MRA god”
You sure she wasn’t delivered by a feminazi she-devil instead? We all know that hell is supermajority female. Trying to get laid in heaven by a chick is going to be tough, as women have worse moral character than men. Ms. Lara Zhivago has adequately proven that point of mine.
____________________
Transhuman
December 12, 2011 at 04:04
The few, not all, of Lara’s posts seem to be desperate self-justification. I wonder why she is concerned that men might speak amongst themselves about matters that concern men, and not take a feminist’s opinion as being truthful or terribly relevant.
I skimmed over her copious use of attempted shaming language, I really think she has no idea how she appears in print. The “knights of honour” made me chuckle though. No Lara, there will not be any white knights coming to your rescue. They belong to an era when women had responsibilities and took them seriously and, in turn, men would make sacrifices for them. Educated men of the 21st century know better.
_________________
Lara Zhivago
December 12, 2011 at 04:19
andybob,
a) The sky is blue, water is wet, and our guest feminist issues foot-stomping demands that she alone sets the parameters of the discussion.
I don’t recall ever setting parameters for discussion. Your interpretation of foot stomping is yours; you are welcome to it, but no foot stomping occurred on this end.
b) The attempts to convince us that eridite, rapier-witted Mr Jack Donovan, published author and long-time Spearhead contributer, would back away from debating a mentally fragile hysteric for any reason other than it’s sheer pointlessness.
The evidence is published at my blog; and has been deleted from Mr. Donovans page. Comment that included links to other evidence was also censored on this page. None of Mr. Donovans mob of savages had any objections.
c) No woman spends a year in prison for failing to give evidence unless she is refusing to testify against her crack-dealing pimp thug-daddy (and only then if she tried to knife the judge). So, I think we can safely dismiss the ‘testimonial’ about her ‘honour’.
I never said I failed to give evidence. I provided the court with my evidence as to the corruption of the prosecutor. I was convicted of contempt in facie curiae, for telling the Magistrate the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth. He and the prosecutor prefer their asses kissed.
d) It is achingly typical for a feminist to denigrate the concept of men’s rights by making some irrelevant and utterly obtuse reference – such as Prince Charming with the beergut.
I totally support men’s rights, and have done so in writing. I totally don’t support women who accuse any man of rape falsely; I have suggested such women get their tongues cut out. I think it is as despicable and disgusting, as a man who rapes a woman. I have been extremely critical of Slutwalk, and supported the Toronto police publicly in telling Slutwalk what a bunch of despicable sluts and liars I thought they were. I have been very critical of women and men, who play mindfuck games with men/women, isntead of being honest about what they want, and entering into fully inforemd consensual agreements with each other.
e) Note how easily Ms Zhivago makes dark allusions to being poorly used by Mr Donovan in some murky, unspecified way. Beast.
As I said, the evidence is on my blog. I am not responsible for Mr. Donovan deleting it from his page, or for you not investigating the matter thoroughly.
f) The obscure reference to the hunting knife foreplay is where I knew for certain that Ms Zhivago is another sad creature that feminism has undhinged. The Pentagon enquiries clinched it.
My apologies if your sex life is boring, or if you find hunting knife foreplay to be immoral, and only done by people who are unhinged. As for the Pentagon: perhaps you may wish to investigate the matter before drawing conclusions.
If only Ms Zhivago and her ilk knew just how much the good men and women of The Spearhead really do long for an honest and logical debate with a feminist. Sadly, we are subjected to nothing more than the peurile rants from cretins like Ms Zhivago who offer nothing more than illogical feminist hatred, entitlement and lies. That is something we already knew.
It appears you only have interest in an honest and logical debate with a certain type of feminist, which you have not yet identified. A feminist must be a particular type of feminist, to be considered worthy of an honest and logical conversation. You refuse to make any enquiries into any information provided you, and this refusal to investigate any issue, you consider to be ‘logical and honest’. Any story told you about an experience you make no effort whatsoever to verify as true, you simply assume and accuse the teller they are telling lies, without any investigation. This conduct you consider ‘logical and honest.”
As I wrote earlier, feminists comdemn themselves so skilfully that it is sometimes difficult to understand how they manage to maintain so much sway over our world.
I have provided you with names for my experiences; I have offered to provide you with further information to verify any statement I made to you. You refused, and your refusal you call ‘logical and honest’.
I am happy to hear any evidence as to how I have condemned myself (apart from demonstrating my ability to make fun of myself (16:40); also not appreciated by anyone except Muk (17:45)).
I very much appreciate honest and sincere feedback; and where evidence is provided with such feedback that proves me to be in error; to amend any working hypothesis I hold on any issue. I am only an Amish feminist as a result of the information available to me and my life experiences (I agree my experiences having been a lover to predominantly military men is perhaps totally out of the experience of many mra readers, that does not mean they are not true though). I spent 14 years sailing and travelling around the world on sail boats; got a skippers licence, lived in dozens of countries; even dated a French soldier from Djibouti who fought for and with Osama Bin Laden against the Soviets.
There are no women in the world with my experiences. Do you know any women who dated both members of Al’Qaeda, and USMC and Special Forces; who is a member of a culture that has no dischord between men and women; as a result of their social contract of radical honesty?
_______________________
Anonymous
December 12, 2011 at 04:20
Lara seems to be stuck somewhere in the crossfire of 2 differing generations of feminism.
The “Equality” feminism of yesteryear has been paved over with angry Gender, “gender-Raunch” feminism.
The Real perversion lies in the fact that American law enforcement is re-defining what the meaning of is, is, and using protocol perversions and semantics games that serve to manufacture Empowerment rhetoric for the Gender-Raunch community.
_______________________
Opus
December 12, 2011 at 04:23
As I seem to recall Lara in Zhivago was a slut who put out for Komarov. That Julie Christie was cute though, so you can hardly blame my dear friend Omar…
______________________
Aharon
December 12, 2011 at 04:25
“A while back some generals at the Pentagon wanted to know what my thoughts were on, shall I call it Amish feminism”.
— The generals consulted Lara because they are naturally worried about a potential insurrection leading to a second American civil war originating from the heartland led by Amish Feminists.
“Don’t believe me: ask my husband”
— The odds are higher that Lara is a single forty-year old virgin living in her parent’s basement. It’s obvious that she is enjoying all the attention from men that she is getting at the Spearhead. Obviously, she does not get much attention in real life. Most likely, Lara is a good physical match with that three hundred pound Don Juan she knows.
I’ve read estimates that ten percent of women suffer from having a Borderline Personality Disorder. I suspect that Lara is way in beyond the border. Feminism is obviously a mental disorder.
_______________________
Lara Zhivago
December 12, 2011 at 04:32
@andybob
No Lara, there will not be any white knights coming to your rescue.
I am not the one wallowing in a poor me victim pity party about being oppressed by Nurse Ratched Ph.D feminists!
Heeeahhh!! Let me go find myself a goddamn Marine with a Hunting Knife; these mra fuckers are boring me to tears!
Adios Amigos,
Your Certifiable Semper Fidelis Nutjob Feminazi Czarina Isabella Arnold!
_______________________
Migu
December 12, 2011 at 05:17
Sgt Martin huh?
He is famous sniper. Died in the 19th century.
Magistrate Meyer. I guess its all in the family
Who was the hinting knife Guy again. Daniel B?
____________________
freebird
December 12, 2011 at 06:24
Attempts to incite violent replys to your alleged lust for hunting knives=big fail.
Now just go away troll.
No one here gives a flying fuck what you have to say.
You are successfully wasting time and energy,by acting in bad faith.
Typical fourth waver!
(nut job)
_______________________
dragnet
December 12, 2011 at 07:47
@ Lara Zhivago
At the risk of feeding a troll, I’ll give my take on things.
Sure, many people here think you are a nutjob, a crazy troll and tireless harridan. And they’re onto something.
But I read your exchange with Jack on facebook and your comments here—you aren’t all nutjob. I think you ask, at times, some valid and pointed questions.
But that’s not why you cut no ice here. You’re being ignored because the type of feminism you espouse doesn’t have any institutional power. To take on your particular, personal brand of feminism is a useless endeavor that, 1) just proves that feminism is really what any particular women believes at any particular time, and 2) makes it clear that your brand of feminism isn’t driving public policy.
The feminism that actually does wield power in the Anglo-American world is exactly like what Jack has described: the ongoing attempt to control male behavior and exploit male disposability to transfer resources and power to women, using the threat of state violence as needed. If you want to be included in the discussion and taken seriously then you must engage the debate on those exact terms because that this our reality at this point in time. If you cannot do this, then there is no space for you here.
_______________________
Geography Bee Finalist himself
December 12, 2011 at 08:18
@ anyone noticing
notice that this troll is calling herself Lara zHIVago. Feminists like her are the HIV destroying everything around them. Yes Lara, you walked right into this one. Please choose your next name to troll under more carefully and stop choosing ones that include embedded within them an abbreviation for a virus that destroys human lives and the African continent the way feminism destroys anything it touches.
_______________________
Mickey T
December 12, 2011 at 08:48
If I understand the definition of “troll” correctly, one can only “troll” (verb) if we let her.
____________________
keyster
December 12, 2011 at 09:12
“You’re being ignored because the type of feminism you espouse doesn’t have any institutional power.”
In other words, if you disagree with the current brand of feminism, what it espouses to be feminism today…take it up with those feminists, rather than trying to make a point of it in an MRA forum.
No one here cares about you’re particular views of feminism.
____________________
Mike Diver
December 12, 2011 at 09:16
Why is the focus of this thread becoming responses to Lara. Just ignore her comments and lets get on with business. Negative attention is still attention.
______________________
dragnet
December 12, 2011 at 09:47
@ Mike Diver
I thought it worthwhile to respond to Lara because individual feminists often seek to derail MRA threads by browbeating guys into debating their own, quixotic brand of feminism—and those guys need to know how to respond to that.
________________
Mickey T
December 12, 2011 at 13:27
Women have one, and only one way of living:
*Expecting (and getting) special treatment from all
*Putting in effort when it’s convenient (lazy)
* Taking little, to no responibilty
* Taking no accountability for their actions or lack of actions
* They are ruthless, uncaring, selfish and greedy
Etc ,Etc ………..
These things are true from the floor mopper to the US Sec’y of State.
And that includes doctors!! I can tell stories which probably amaze a lot of you guys. Perhaps in another discussion I’ll get the opportunity to do so. My advice to you all is to NEVER, EVER use a female doctor if it is possible.
@ Charles Martel
How is a guy like you had/has a female doctor??
@ Rocco
Krugman has credibility with his Liberal elitist cronies, and those who share his twisted ideology, as well as the ignorant and gullible. No mystery, look at who lives in our White House.
____________________
nugganu
December 12, 2011 at 13:55
Hey, who let the white feminist c*nt on here?
__________________
hf
December 12, 2011 at 14:00
Lara is plain, batshit insane.
___________________
woggy
December 12, 2011 at 16:25
Lara hooted:
“The evidence is published at my blog; and has been deleted from Mr. Donovans page. Comment that included links to other evidence was also censored on this page. None of Mr. Donovans mob of savages had any objections.”
If the so called evidence deleted was as insane and disjointed as what we’ve been treated to here, I can see why he deleted it. I’d expect nothing less, as a matter of fact; allowing your brand of delightful nonsense to persist is like letting the inmates run the asylum.
A hunting knife as a sex toy?
Try a hand grenade for real excitement, but make sure you enlist the expertise of the Marine, he’ll know what pins to pull and when.
Leave fatso at the bar.
________________________
Boxer
December 12, 2011 at 17:47
P.S. Lara Zhivago: Shut up, whore; nobody gave you permission to speak.
________________________
E
December 13, 2011 at 00:17
Boxer
P.S. Lara Zhivago: Shut up, whore; nobody gave you permission to speak.
Lara fails to understand a simple concept:
The right to free speech is NOT the right to have an audience.
Having an audience is a privilege that must be earned.
____________________
Mickey T
December 13, 2011 at 09:33
@ Woggy, Boxer, hp, hugganu etc
Good job in showing how humorous the truth can sound.
_______________________
Chevy Chase
December 13, 2011 at 21:08
And the stupid keep arguing with the stupid.
===============================
Sipsey Street Irregulars: "SSI Exclusive: Hiding mass murder behind "national security." What Newsweak & the FBI didn't want you to know about PATCON and the OKC Bombing."
Timothy McVeigh's execution was faked.
He blackmailed the goverment, and they came to an agreement. His execution would be faked and he would be granted a new identity.
McVeigh's OKC commanding officer, a friend of mine, Michael ....., a US Army Special Force sniper, met with McVeigh on the 4th of July weekend, after the alleged execution. Michael was John Doe #2, and was ordered by his pentagon superiors to 'disappear' after the Bombing.
Michael subsequently was willing to disclose his information and role in the bombing, and I contacted the FBI and the San Francisco District Attorney, to enquire whether they would support him coming forward. Both declined Michael's offer.
However Michael stated that his pentagon superiors were willing to consider full disclosure of all the national security issues related to OKC, but they said if that occurred; such disclosure would open a can of worms, that led to: JFK assassination, and various other cover-ups, all of which were connected.
There are also circumstantial clues that McVeigh was subsequently involved in 9/11 Attacks.
I know this sounds strange, and I don't blame anyone for being skeptical.
http://twitter.com/#!/Timothy4316
0 comments:
Post a Comment
SQSwans-Practicing Radical Honoursty Values:
“All real freedom starts with freedom of speech. If there is no freedom of speech, then there can be no real freedom”
“I (may) disagree (or be offended) with every word you say, but I will defend to the death, your right to say it”
“The greatest way to live with honour in this world is to be what we pretend to be”
Accordingly feel free to Unwash Your Trailer Trash Mind Jail, with your Blind Beliefs in Bullshit, or Pure Reason...